[nuffsenuff]

Reagan needs to be in the Great category at Number 3.

Clinton and Carter need to be bumped down.

[F.J. Mitchell]

Clinton and Carter need to be bumped off.............Off the list of Presidents I mean..off the list of Presidents.

We need a special list for them:

Presidential wannabe's who were elected to the office, sit in the Oval office for one or two terms and left office
still just Presidential wannabes.

[Rockitz]

Clinton and Carter need to be bumped down.

Agreed.

[ilgipper]

for post 1920 Presidents, bump up all the Repubs one section, and bump down all Dems one section, and it's a pretty accurate take.

Not sure about Eisenhauer being under near great. Clinton should be below average and not failure, because it was largely a prosperous time. Individuals like Carter should be in the Failure category, as that was a disasterous period here and abroad.

[Kenny Bunk]

What in the name of Manitou would lead anyone to place JFK on the list of worthwile (nevermind great) Presidents? Not only did this careless pill freak and seriously diseased sexual criminal start Vietnam as a serious war, after being specifically told not to by no less than MacArthur AND Eisenhower, but he blundered us into one foreign crisis after another, nearly getting our asses fried in the process.

To begin with, he stole the goddam election ... as even admitted nowadays by hardened Democrats. His career in Congress was a joke. His brother is a murderer, his cousin a rapist, his nephews an abomination to all of New England.

Carter? A micromanaging mean-spirited SOB, who damn near sank the whole ship. Clinton? Just who in the hell came up with this hossheep? Peter Jennings?

[Dawgreg]

Yeah, and George Bush needs to be elevated and LBJ "de-elevated". *~*