Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cosine
Golly, do you think it is possible that pollution controls might have improved things since "many years ago?"

Maybe, maybe not. Soot is very hard to control.

I bet you had never heard of the practice of "blowing soot", and I bet they still do it at midnight.

29 posted on 06/10/2004 8:23:39 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: farmfriend

ping


31 posted on 06/10/2004 8:29:48 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: CurlyDave

Granted that soot is hard to control and that blowing soot off various surfaces improves combustion processes to control other pollutants and reduce overall cost. I'll bet they did it at midnight so they didn't have to field calls.

What set me off was the implication that the power company is somehow irresponsible. Because we have centralized power production we have less pollution overall than we did when everyone burned whatever and the power production we have keeps getting cleaner by little tiny steps. When you burn things to get energy you will have unwanted byproducts be they soot, fly ash, heat, or radioactive compounds. Question is which poses least overall risk compared to benefits.


37 posted on 06/10/2004 9:44:35 AM PDT by cosine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson