Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BJungNan
Better ways to go about it than nuclear

Not really. Coal or nuc are the only practical options, but what do you think are the "better ways?"

27 posted on 06/10/2004 7:57:22 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: from occupied ga
what do you think are the "better ways?"

First, we can tap into our own oil reserves. Second, we could make cars much more efficient without compromise to occupant comfort and safety. Third, we could make homes much more efficient without significant added expense.

Are these things enough. I'm not sure. I do know that at our home our electric bill averages $48.00 a month while my neighbors are paying $180 a month average. That's a pretty big difference and if everyone did that, certainly it would make an impact.

32 posted on 06/10/2004 8:47:37 AM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: from occupied ga

No sense arguing with nuc-o-phobes, Dude. They get all the scientific knowledge they need from Jane Fonda movies.

As noted above, there is more radioactivity generated by coal powered plants than by all the nuclear generating activity in the history of the earth. Hell, people living in Denver are exposed to more radioactivity on a single sunny day than was released by Three Mile Island (which, BTW, worked as designed in an emergency).

Heard from DIH lately?


33 posted on 06/10/2004 9:05:29 AM PDT by mngalt (The Al Franken Decade is soooooo over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson