C'mon, TN, you know perfectly well that the term "serial killer" refers to one who murders other humans in the acting out of a psycho-sexual fantasy. It certainly does not cover either abortion doctors or their motives, unless, of course, one is trying to inflame passions OR "encourage" those who take it upon themselves to shoot them.
This, and the "cannibalism" nonsense, are simply your and some other zealots' attempt at hype. However, your comment about lying and decieving are well taken, just perhaps more ironically than you'd like.
Abortionists kill alive individual human beings, serially, one right after the next. That's serial killing. I'll use the terms I choose without being herded into convenient boxes by your chiding. But that was a nice try to be condescending ... interesting that you brought that term 'condescending' forward in this discussion, first.
What an odd, unique definition of "serial killer," based on your own bias. While there may be cases that meet your definition, the definition is clear on its face: killing in series, one after another.
There is no encouragement of violence in calling killing, killing, and noting that it is done in series.
You might look up "cannibalism," too. It is appropriate, historically and metaphorically, even if there is technological ingestion rather than oral. Cannibals believed they could take on the nature of those they consummed, just as the embryonic stem cell and cloning of nascent life is supposed to give us eternal youth.
Ad hominem attacks against MHG are more telling of your logical processes than his.