Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: q_an_a

the problem is that they are lead by a list of investors that looks like the pentagon, the first Reagan White House and dozens of other deep pocket people. This story is half the story of what they have done to turn garbage into electricty or oil.
//////////////////
this post makes no sense. con agra is an enormous investor in the project. (something like 30-60 mil) in fact i think they have a controlling interest in the missouri plant. government agencies that have invested in the company are the doe and the epa. the dod hasn't put any money in the project at all. there are a number of deep pocketed new yorkers who have put money into the company but they are believers in a appel.

//////////////////
The biggest problem in the telling of this companies' story is that it proves that oil is not always made from fossil based products. It is unlikely that reporters will ever connect the dots.

why is this a problem?


104 posted on 06/09/2004 3:06:05 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: ckilmer

" it proves that oil is not always made from fossil based products."

???? What does this mean ??

If something became a fossil, it was NOT converted into oil, so how is oil made from fossils ?


112 posted on 06/10/2004 8:28:13 AM PDT by RS (Just because they're out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson