Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: qwertyz
Great link qwertyz.

Just for fun, I went there to see what it would take to get a system running W2Kpro fully patched. It would appear that I'd need SP4 for W2K. Then, I'd have to download 250 separate "hotfixes" to go along with them. I could cut them to a disk I suppose, but that still leaves me with a lot of work ahead of me.

If one were an unlucky administrator of a Win-XP server, and I wanted to make a CD for patching systems, I'd need to download SP1 for Win-XP, then 499 patches! Jeez! I'd not realized how truely broken their patching process is.

I really feel sorry for poor bastards stuck on that treadmill.

13 posted on 06/09/2004 10:24:12 AM PDT by zeugma (The Great Experiment is over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: zeugma
It would appear that I'd need SP4 for W2K. Then, I'd have to download 250 separate "hotfixes" to go along with them.

Your numbers are way off, there's nowhere near that many patches needed post-SP4. My guess is you already knew that but as usual jumped at any chance to smear Microsoft, even with bogus information.

If one were an unlucky administrator of a Win-XP server...

Windows XP is not a server operating system. You probably knew that too.

I'd need to download SP1 for Win-XP, then 499 patches!

More bogus information, quite obviously. Microsoft is often deserving of criticism, but making up lies about them is just as bad as anything they've done to anyone.

14 posted on 06/09/2004 10:31:42 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson