Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minnesota CCW: Churches, charities air concerns over concealed-carry gun law
Duluth News-Tribune ^ | Jun. 04, 2004 | MARIE MCCAIN

Posted on 06/08/2004 12:07:28 PM PDT by jdege

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: chadwimc
My pastor likes to say "...they can never out brag me at those pastors meetings..."

LOL!

21 posted on 06/08/2004 1:45:09 PM PDT by scott7278 ("FR will NOT be used to help replace Bush with a Democrat." -- Jim Robinson, 2/01/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

"The way the law was passed was unconstitutional. "

Is this really true?

No. The Minnesota Supreme Court has ruled on exactly what the legislature must do to meet the constitutional requirements, and the legislature followed them exactly.

"The law requires specific language be posted to ban guns in a church."

What's wrong with that? If the state has a right to carry law and someone doesn't want guns on their property, how is anybody supposed to know? On the other hand, why should they have the right to override a state law in the first place?

The churches want to have the unique ability to forbid carry in their own special way. They claim to object to the posting language on religious grounds, and seek an exemption just for the churches - which gets awfully close to a violation of the establishment clause for my tastes.

We don't let churches use their own language on emergency exit signs, or on handicapped parking signs. I see no reason why they should get a unique exemption to the language on the no gun signs.

"The law does not allow churches to keep people from storing their guns in their cars, in church parking lots."

It seems pretty clear what the REAL issue is here. These groups oppose the concealed carry law - period.

What this is really about is keeping Lillehaug's name in the papers, as a preparation for his 2006 Senate run, while allowing his law-firm to scam the churches for a couple of hundred grand.

What is ELCA??

Evangelical Lutheran Church of America.

22 posted on 06/08/2004 2:12:39 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ZULU; jdege

A partial list of the members of the "World Council of Churches".leaders of these "churches" push a political agenda outside and contrary to the teachings of the bible.
I believe this is the prophesied world church of The Revelation.

African Methodist Episcopal Church [USA]
African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church [USA]
American Baptist Churches in the USA
Anglican Church of Canada
Apostolic Catholic Assyrian Church of the East, N.A. Diocese
Canadian Council of Churches**
Canadian Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) in Canada
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
Christian Methodist Episcopal Church [USA]
Church of the Brethren [USA]
Episcopal Church
Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church Abroad [Canada]
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada
Hungarian Reformed Church in America
International Council of Community Churches [USA]
International Evangelical Church [USA]
Moravian Church in America
National Baptist Convention of America
National Baptist Convention, USA, Inc.
National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA**
Orthodox Church in America
Polish National Catholic Church
Presbyterian Church in Canada
Presbyterian Church (USA)
Progressive National Baptist Convention, Inc. [USA]
Reformed Church in America [USA]
Religious Society of Friends [USA] - Friends General Conference - Friends United Meeting
United Church of Canada
United Church of Christ [USA]
United Methodist Church [USA]

this is just North America

a full listing is here: http://www.wcc-coe.org/wcc/who/mch-e.html


23 posted on 06/09/2004 8:31:43 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: brbethke

Interesting little tale.

However, the villain here was not Garibaldi.

Prior to Italy's reunification, it, like Germany of roughly the same period, was broken into a number of independent duchies, kingdoms, etc. A good part of it was under the control of the polyglot Austro-Hungarian "Empire" in the North. Most prominent of these territories were the "Papal States". This was a stretch of territory running across the middle of the Italian Peninsula and centered around the City of Rome. It was directly ruled by the Pope as a secular AND religious leader.

During the mid 1800's there was a resurgance of Nationalist
sentiment throughout most of continental Europe. Average Europeans began thinking more along the lines of Nationalist states instead of artifical political entities centered around some Feudal overlord.

Just as France, an old and established nation-state was a fulcrum of opposition to German unification, the Papal States were a fulcrum of opposition to Italian unification.

Eventually, thanks to the efforts of Garibaldi and others, the various independent Italian States were dissolved, including the Papal States, and a unified Italy constructed, under the rule of the House of Savoy, a ruling family from what is now southeastern France but which was, in actuality, Italian at the time. The French received Savoy in return for not interfering with Garibaldi and the House of Savoy in their plans for unification of Italy. This was very similar to what Bismarck achieved in Germany.

Since Garibaldi had, in the process, eliminated the existence of an independent Papal State, the Pope excommunicated Garibaldi and all those patriotic Italians who were involved in the unification of their country.

Until realtively recently, all Popes from that time on clostered themselves in voluntary "exile" within the confines of the actual territory permitted them by the Italian Government, i.e. Vatican "City".

I would also like to point out that Papal Justification of control of actual territory by the Pope was in part based on a fradulent document called "The Donation of Constantine".

This fraudullent document alleged that Constantine the Graet, as Emperor of the Romans, the First Christian Emperor, and the rightful ruler of all of the Roman Empire, had withdrawn his capitol to Constantinople, and surrendered temporal control of the western part of the Empire to the Pope as his lawful successor in all things temporal there. This claims of Papal supreamcy in the temporal realm provided the Medieval Popes with significant authority in western Europe over the temporal rulers there.

This is NOT a theological issue, any more than the Methodists et al intruding into the realm of American foreign policy and domestic constitutional issues. Like the latter, it is a good example of why a secular state is a good thing, even though a secular state can ans should acknowledge Judaeo-Christian prinicples.

Nevertheless, I applause Possenti's marksmamship and chivalry, but alas, the Catholic Church, like most mainstream western Christian faiths has been so castrated by pacifism withn the ranks that I doubt aht any individual associated with firearms will be cannonized.

Personally, I like St. Iago Matamorros myself. St. George and St. Michael are pretty good also.


24 posted on 06/09/2004 11:33:12 AM PDT by ZULU (They weree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson