Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheEditor
WJC was not merely magnanimous, he was truly generous in both spirit and word for RMN. I have little doubt he would do so for Ronaldus Magnus.

I think WJC would give RR at least as respectful an oration as he gave RMN. He emulated Pres. Reagan in certain ways. However, Barbara Walters on ABC on Sat. made it clear that Mrs. Reagan would have Pres. Bush speak, and maybe Pres. Ford, but that certain former Presidents would not be speaking. That made clear, Clinton's "anger" that neither he nor President Carter had been asked to speak "as of yet" shows his complete lack of regard for the bereaved widow, and his belief that he can still shame her into changing her mind. I doubt that either the Clintons or Carters can count themselves among Nancy's 3,000 closest friends. Yet she was gracious enough to invite them anyway. More class on her part than either of them deserved.

648 posted on 06/08/2004 11:54:05 AM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: ntnychik

I don't think the American people should have to deal with the hypocrisy dripping from Clinton if he were allowed to speak. I don't care what he said -- it's not about WJC.


650 posted on 06/08/2004 11:55:59 AM PDT by NavySEAL F-16 ("Proud to be an American")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 648 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson