Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reagan’s Useful Idiot
The American Spectator ^ | June 8, 2004 | George Neumayr

Posted on 06/08/2004 2:56:07 AM PDT by Cincinatus

The Washington Post reports tributes to Reagan's "willingness to cooperate with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in reducing the threat from nuclear weapons." Notice the phrase, "willingness to cooperate." The New York Times headlined Mikhail Gorbachev's Monday op-ed, "A President Who Listened." Not A President Who Led, but A President Who Listened.

Reagan was a giant in the company of dwarves. Yet the dwarves are still deluded, still convinced their "sophistication" is superior to his "simplicity." Casting about for words of faux praise, they end up patronizing Reagan. They can't quite bring themselves to admit that he was right and they were wrong -- that the clear-eyed conservatism they despised in him won the Cold War.

The New York Times editorialized that Reagan was "fortunate" that a visionary like Gorbachev appeared on the scene to walk the world toward peace. "He was fortunate to have as his counterpart Mikhail Gorbachev, a Soviet leader ready to acknowledge his society's failings and interested in reducing international tensions," the Times wrote.

Gorbachev's op-ed was equally nauseating. It might as well have been headlined, "A President Who Listened To Me." Gorbachev allows himself a moment of self-congratulation, "Of course, the new Soviet leadership could have continued the old ways." This is like a thief patting himself on the back for giving up theft.

Gorbachev took a "new path," because Reagan had successfully blocked off the old one. Even in this encomium to Reagan, Gorbachev can't resist one last burst of resentment at Reagan for his "evil empire" truth-telling. Gorbachev writes of Reagan's "confrontational rhetoric toward the Soviet Union, and more than rhetoric -- by a number of actions that caused concern both in our country and among many people throughout the world."

If Gorbachev still smarts over Reagan's accurate assessment of the "evil empire, "that's because Gorbachev was part of it. When Gorbachev dies, will newspapers like the Times -- which praise Reagan in between plenty of hedges and qualifications -- offer similar qualifications in obits about Gorbachev? Will they record, for example, that he supported persecuting the kulaks?

Before it was fashionable to treat Gorbachev as an oracle of bottomless moral authority, press accounts would acknowledge that he had been a Stalinist (When that was de rigueur in the Soviet Union, he penned essays on the glories of Stalinism) and a supporter of Lenin's "one step forward, two steps back" doctrine. As a party hack on the rise, Gorbachev had no problem implementing ruthless Communist policies (such as ousting from schools children whose parents had committed ideological sins). Back in the 1980s Time magazine quoted a Soviet who remembered Gorbachev explaining to him the importance of "brute force, which alone secured working discipline on the working farms." Even when Gorbachev was supposedly on his new path, he was pining for the old one. "In politics and ideology, we are seeking to revive the spirit of Leninism," Gorbachev wrote in Perestroika. As Baltic nationalists remember, Gorbachev didn't want the evil empire to break up. He sought to preserve it aggressively, sending off checks to thuggish Soviet client states until the treasury ran dry.

As a disciple of Lenin, Gorbachev should remember Lenin's phrase, "useful idiots." Lenin, had he witnessed the demise of Communism, would have called Gorbachev Reagan's useful idiot. Contrary to Gorbachev's patronizing -- in his second term, writes Gorbachev, Reagan "emphasized a different set of goals. I think he understood that it is the peacemakers, above all, who earn a place in history" -- Reagan gently pulled a frightened Gorbachev toward peace. Reagan's gentility was a function of his strength. He didn't mind letting Gorbachev wallow in his own vanity and delusion if that made it easier to end the Cold War and dismember the Soviet Union.

Historians won't pay much attention to Gorbachev's self-justifying remembrances. But they will record Reagan's "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall." The irony of Reagan never caring about who got the credit is that history will heap it on him while ignoring those who did.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: communism; gorbachev; liberals; reagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Cincinatus

Have the appeasers at the New York Times ever written a word about the gulags yet?


21 posted on 06/08/2004 6:13:09 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad (Rising waves, what motive is behind your impulse? The desire to reach upwards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevem
When comparing giants and dwarves, think about what occupied Reagan's time. He set an agenda regarding foreign and domestic issues that mad the 1980's a watershed on the world stage. To a great extent Bush (H.W.) benefitted.

And not just George H.W. Bush, but most ironically of all, Beelzebubba. If not for the accomplishments of Reagan's foreign policy in forcing the end of the Cold War, America would have never elected a draft-dodging, peace-marching "co-president" with basically no interest in a strong defense. I'm not blaming Reagan for this by any means, just pointing out one of life's great ironies.

Henry Lee II
"Leftists are crazed and violent people,
with the blood of millions on their hands.”

22 posted on 06/08/2004 6:13:58 AM PDT by HenryLeeII (God blessed America when He gave us Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HenryLeeII

"If not for the accomplishments of Reagan's foreign policy in forcing the end of the Cold War....."

Your post started me wondering .... what if Reagan had not won the Cold War and the arms race had continued throughout the 90s ..... I wonder if the exceptional economic expansion that President Clinton took credit for would have materialized to the extent that it did.


23 posted on 06/08/2004 6:29:24 AM PDT by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1

My theory is that all of the prosperity we've enjoyed from the mid-80s through the present is in one way or another connected to Reagan's tax cuts AND the end of the Cold War.


24 posted on 06/08/2004 6:33:27 AM PDT by HenryLeeII (God blessed America when He gave us Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

BTTT


25 posted on 06/08/2004 7:01:35 AM PDT by hattend (Rest in Peace, President Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson