I gather you are also for lifting the restriction on brothers and sisters from marrying?
After all, using your logic, state sanctioned mentally warped children resulting from incest has no impact upon you.
Children who are raised in homosexual settings are much more likely to be emerge from their experience emotionally warped.
There are scientific studies that support this position.
For that reason alone this exclusion to marriage should reside side by side to incest.
Fine, give me the sources of your research. Direct me to specific articles in qualified journals that show the children of homosexual parents are more likely to be emotionally warped. When sited my sources, I gave them. Start with this: www.prevent-abuse-now.com/stats.htm#Offenders
I spent several years working with children of abuse, several different institutions from Level 4 Prisons to schools for wards of the court. The primary reason incest and abuse ultimately hurt is the betrayal of trust. The child trusts the adult to protect and that trust is broken.
If you take the time to peruse the data that I have linked, you would see that the abusers are predominant heterosexuals. The abusers are often family members. This is true nearly 90% of the time. In fact, there are almost no known incidents of child abuse in children raise by a homosexual couple. Try as you might, the statistics and any corollaries do not support this at all. If we follow logically, then we should ban heterosexual marriage
Nothing in my logic—which I am actually using—points to condoning marriage between sister and brother.
Nothing in what I have written on this topic either implies or suggests that I condone or condemn either gay marriage or incest. In fact, it is in you that have made that leap.
So far the
My point is that this is not, and should not be the pivotal issue in this year's election