-- the USSC defines free speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion.
Never has paulsen, never will. The USSC is empowered to judge disputes as per Art III Sec 2, "with such Exceptions --- as Congress shall make."
We the people control both court & congress.
Now the USSC defines nude dancing as "speech",
You want to ban dancing, paulsen? Why?
but not political campaign ads 30 days prior to an election.
A Rino Congress passed that 'law'.
Free speech does NOT include saying "God" at a high school commencement ceremony.
Preach your religion at church, not at a public school, paulsen.
Freedom of religion has been turned on its head to be freedom from religion.
Simple hype. You can practice whatever religion you want.
Five justices determine what the first amendment means for 300 million Americans.
Rant on.
And tpaine wants these same liberal jerkoffs to define the second amendment for us.
No, I want the USSC to tell the State of CA to stop their violations of our RKBA's. - And, -- I want our Executive branch to enforce that decision upon the CA state officials that have ignored their oaths of office to protect & defend our US Constitution.
In fact paulsen, you might give a little thought to why you scoff at that oath.
AND WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY WOULD?
That's my whole point. What has the USSC done recently to make you think that they would rule in such a conservative manner? Actually, the chances are very good that they would simply follow the Ninth Circuit.
The good citizens of the state of California need to get off their butts and pass a state constitutional amendment that protects their RKBA. Period.