The Man Who Brought Down "That Wall"

This may shock you. During the eight years of the Reagan Presidency I was not his biggest fan. I looked not so much at what he accomplished but what he didn't accomplish. My expectations were that government would get smaller under President Reagan. It didn't. I was disappointed.

I looked at the agencies left in place -- the National Endowment for the Arts, the Legal Services Corporation (which has done so much damage) and A.I.D. -- and I felt that the Reagan Administration did not make a real effort to curtail them. I was disappointed.

Also there was school prayer and a Right To Life Amendment. They got lip service but little else. I was disappointed.

There was Sandra Day O'Connor who had already begun to show her independence from the man who appointed her. I was disappointed.

I could go on and on, but you get the picture. The man, I thought, had such incredible potential and goodwill and yet he did not use that to accomplish domestic goals. I was disappointed.

But then, thanks to the late Dr. Robert Krieble, my colleagues and I began to travel to the far reaches of the "Evil Empire." We taught politics and small business. Ronald Reagan was already a few months out of office when we made our first trip. As I encountered people in Eastern Europe, the Baltics and in Russia itself, Ronald Reagan loomed as a larger-than-life figure to them. Several asked me in hushed tones if I had ever met him. When I said I had, suddenly my stature grew.

I will never forget being in Tomsk, Siberia. That was an outback place if there ever was one. A big husky fellow in the back of the crowded room where we did our seminar on how to win elections rose up. In a booming voice he asked me if we were for real. I assured him we were. Then he said, "You know Ronald Reagan encouraged us. We felt we could be bolder when he was in office. I get the impression that President Bush is not such a positive person as Reagan. What can you tell me?" Imagine that kind of understanding in one of the really remote places in Siberia. I assured him that President Bush 41 would not betray him or his people. It was then that I said that Yalta was a great tragedy and it is something I and many Americans are ashamed of. The room burst into applause.

Then there was Khabarovsk, in the Far East of Russia. There I met a General who was in charge of the military district of that whole area. He told me he used to get up every morning and say to himself "what are the ten things I can do today to help defeat America?" He went on to confess, "I hated your country." Then he told me one day Pravda was up in arms because President Reagan had charged that the Soviets lied to their people. He said that shook him up. He said he was not sure why but that statement hit him hard. He began to investigate things. He found out that Reagan was right. Lenin, Stalin and right down to the leaders in modern times had lied to him and to the Russian people. He said he had become completely disoriented. Everything he once believed turned out to be a lie. But now he didn't know what to believe. He took his huge hands and grabbed mine. He looked directly into my eyes and said, "Please help me." I indeed tried to, but it was President Reagan who got him to think.

Natan Sharansky, the Soviet dissident who was imprisoned in Siberia when President Reagan made his famous "Evil Empire" speech, came to the Free Congress Foundation when he was released. He expressed profound gratitude to President Reagan. He said that when Pravda (which ironically means truth) splashed on their front page that Reagan had the gall to call the Soviet Union the "Evil Empire," all the prisoners in the gulag began to spread the word. He said it was absolutely electric. It gave hope to the thousands of refuseniks who were imprisoned for political reasons.

I came to think of Ronald Reagan as the great man he was by talking with those he helped to liberate. Someone finally had the courage to face down the Soviet Union. Soon after we began our efforts in the Soviet empire, the Berlin wall came down. Then all of the Eastern European nations were liberated...even Romania and Albania. Then came the end of the Soviet Union itself.

Today, the nation that had been the dominant threat against America for most of the 20th Century is no more. And the successor nations do not wish us ill.

I was so tied up with my agenda that I failed to see the big picture. Sure, President Reagan did not do everything I wanted him to do, but he changed the world. How many other Presidents can claim that? I could have pretended that I was a fan of the Reagan Presidency all along. But that would not have been honest. No, it took travels from one end of Russia to the other, much of Ukraine and 10 of the Soviet Republics as well as every country in Eastern Europe, except what is now Serbia, to learn of the greatness of Ronald Reagan. When the full story is told I should imagine we will learn of many other things this President did to liberate the Soviet empire. Regardless, the people in the former "Evil Empire" know who their hero is. I am just embarrassed that it took me so long to figure it out. Oh yes, and I am no longer disappointed.

Classic case of a political theorist encountering a practical politician. What they mean by "politics is the art of the possible" is that while one may be an adherent to a theory that calls for, among other things, reduced government, in practice you take what you can get in recognition of the fact that you must run your government in the company of people whose beliefs in the area differ. Or you end up not running a government at all. This is a difficult concept for those who regard the word "compromise" as meaning solely "untrue to one's principles." The truth is that there is a very great deal more to politics than holding principles.

Not according to some,it's all or nothing. I have been around Freerepublic for a long time and the the one issue people never fail to amaze me. It's already starting now with some saying I didnt get this so I will never vote for him (Bush) again. These are the same people that helped give us toon and bitched and wined the whole eight yrs. Yet you will never see them take blame for it.The christian right bragged and it was proven that over 4 mil of them stayed home (SHOW EM ).It worked we got clintoon.

"Werich is starting to sound like Buchannon a big winer."*********************************************************************************

He's never changed his tune, so you must not have been listening.

This is a difficult concept for those who regard the word "compromise" as meaning solely "untrue to one's principles." The truth is that there is a very great deal more to politics than holding principles.

You are abolutely right. If all one holds is principles one will soon find them torn and tattered and nothing accomplished at all.

This site like many others are full of people who haven't a clue about getting things done.

In a parlimentary system the majority party can work its will. But in a Representative Republic, it is very hard to rule. In the two party system one parties support is never enough. A leader must get his own followers and some of his oppositions support to effect change. It is not easy.

The reason our Repulic has endured is it is very hard to make a change.

The Democrats from about 1938 until 1968 were very good at it. Only Reagan and Bush 43 have managed to effect change.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.