Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tallguy
Ahhh.

If he had said "not that there are any non-ballistic intercontinental missiles", then he would have been correct?

66 posted on 06/07/2004 11:53:24 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Izzy Dunne
Maybe, maybe not. The only thing that limits the range of cruise missiles is fuel capacity & (more importantly) international treaties. I think the ALCM's that were carried aloft by B52's had their range limited relative to their original spec by SALT II.

I think that the same applied to the submarine and ship launched tomahawks. The strategic arms treaties at the time counted launch platforms. Imagine the confusion if every ship & sub suddenly, overnight became a nuke launcher!

It's been a long time, so I might be wrong about this.

69 posted on 06/07/2004 12:00:51 PM PDT by Tallguy (Surviving in PA....thats the "other PA"...Pennsylvania.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson