Posted on 06/06/2004 11:06:33 PM PDT by genghis
>>>...how democrats think...
They don't.
They feel.
Your implicit assumption is unsupported by available evidence.
To be a Democrat in 2004, you have to be hateful, and mentally ill.
this came from Teachers.Net ??
Well it explains why our kids can't read .. these idiots have not a clue
And.........It only took the writer three weeks to prepare the BS.
To be a Democrat in 2004 you have to believe that :
1. You must be against the death penalty for murderers and terrorists because life is precious but for aborting unborn children at any point of a pregnancy for any reason whatsoever.
2. People are entitled to whatever subsidy they can get from the taxpayers but people who want to keep what they earn are greedy.
3. Protesting the mission, slandering the Commander-in-Chief, constant Viet Nam references and voting against funding the mission is somehow supporting the troops.
4. Completely ignoring the law and the will of the people is OK for the mayor of San Francisco but not a judge in Alabama.
5. The Republican administration is more responsible for the September 11 attacks than the men who actually flew the planes into the buildings.
6. Questioning the patriotism of others is wrong unless you're talking about "Benedict Arnold" CEOs or a Republican president.
7. The same government that can't deliver the mail can run the health care system.
8. A man being forced to wear a dog leash is worse than and deserves more press coverage than a public beheading.
That only took me 15 minutes.
To think one needs something to do the thinking WITH. Anatomical diagnosis (the part involved) in the case at hand is, I balieve, self-evident.
Just once I'd like to read something written by a Demoncrat that wasn't totally stupid or not funny.
Their defense of bimbo bill and his commie wife is
disgusting.
Is it just me or does this make the rounds about twice a year?
Bravo! Brilliant.
Try "twice a week". :(
Off-topic, but did anyone else, out of the blue, have to log in again just now? I can't figure out what happened.
I've often wondered how intelligent (yes, they have brains) people can maintain opinions so diametrically oposed to the truth. I believe that in itself is a major clue.
When I saw the confirmation hearing of Robert Bork and saw Teddy Kennedy, Joseph Biden and Howard Metzembaum use sophistry laced arguments and manipulations to attack Bork, I realized that there was more going on than a simple clash of world views. It was Good versus Evil.
Supernatural, malevolent evil exists and there are people who have given themselves over to serving it. The unifying force of serving evil is the best explanation for the fact that militant feminists who fiercely promote the killing of the the innocent unborn and Islamic terrorists who enslave women and fiercely kill the innocent find common cause.
Consider the diverse groups that we lump together as the enemy and how they all support EVIL. They often seem to illogically defend and cover for one another. It's not so illogical when you realize they're really all on the same team.
Western liberalism is a major nexus of evil. The National Democratic Party is evil. On a local level there are a lot of useful idiots who may be basically good people but on a national level there are very few who are righteous. I believe that abortion and esp. partial birth abortion has served as a litmus test to insure that no person with a concience need apply for a national level office.
One thing of interest, if Satan is behind it all; It gives me pause that he seems to be a strong advocate for gun control. I see this as the set up for the bloodbath described in Rev 13:7, 15.
That only took me 15 minutes.
#9. Bill clinton was the greatest president ever and Algore won in 2000.
#10. Hitlery clinton deserves to be the next president.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.