[conservative in nyc]

Oh, it's starting all right. If you have a very strong stomach, take a look at Monday's New York Slimes editorial:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/07/opinion/07MON1.html?pagewanted=print&position=

It's a day late and too disgusting for me to post. Accentuate the negative. Minimize the positive.

[txradioguy]

We haven't even had his funeral and the NY Slimes is already trying to re-write his legacy.

Disgusting.

Who wrote that POS? Jayson Blair?

[Mo1]

And to think the Times really tried to be nice in that article ..

It speaks Volumes of the kind of people they are

[heleny]

If you have a very strong stomach, take a look at Monday's New York Slimes editorial:

I didn't look, but if they put negative stuff only on the editorial page, they're not as bad as the Los Angeles Times, which editorialized on the main "news" story on the top half of the front page that Clinton achieved more than Reagan. It was only in the 4th paragraph (very early in the article, since their paragraphs are usually only 1-2 sentences nowadays). Even a moderate-liberal lady I know who usually likes the LAT fumed that she stopped reading after that totally inappropriate sentence.

[Dog Gone]

That is perhaps the most hateful and inaccurate editorial I have ever seen. The New York Times has sunk to a new low.