To: baltoga
CNN:
Police estimated the number of demonstrators at 500,000. BBC: "but the police reckon there were more like 25,000."
Perfectly understandable. The CNN number indicated the number of fingers and toes of the protestors.
To: Always Right
7 posted on
06/04/2004 1:31:05 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: Always Right
LOL!
<< Perfectly understandable. The CNN number indicated the number of fingers and toes of the protestors.>>
I wonder if CNN will retract this absurd estimate.
10 posted on
06/04/2004 1:33:47 PM PDT by
baltoga
To: Always Right
Perfectly understandable. The CNN number indicated the number of fingers and toes of the protestors.Yes, and probably the lice, crabs, etc.
11 posted on
06/04/2004 1:34:46 PM PDT by
Constitution Day
(Rush may be "show prep for the media", but FR is show prep for RUSH!)
To: Always Right
"CNN: Police estimated the number of demonstrators at 500,000.
BBC: "but the police reckon there were more like 25,000."
Perfectly understandable. The CNN number indicated the number of fingers and toes of the protesters."
No, no, no. That is the number of registered Democrats that were at the protest. Sure most are dead, but they were there in spirit, so that counts.
27 posted on
06/04/2004 2:11:09 PM PDT by
MPJackal
(Waiting for the big one and some nice beach front property in Nevada.)
To: Always Right
CNN: Police estimated the number of demonstrators at 500,000.
BBC: "but the police reckon there were more like 25,000."
Why believe BBC over CNN? The both lie, right?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
