Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TommyDale

I commented on the list in a local group. Heres the liberal response.

http://www.cnn.com/2000/LAW/08/columns/fl.dorf.goreclinton.08.01/

Because CNN says so.


21 posted on 06/04/2004 12:59:11 PM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

I am sure that some 9th Circuit Judge will rule that the 12th isn't worded CORRECTLY to prevent Clinton from being the Vice-President NOR the POTUS in case of Effingkerry's demise, based on the 22nd.


29 posted on 06/04/2004 1:08:45 PM PDT by PISANO (NEVER FORGET 911 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

"In support of this argument, one might also cite the 12th Amendment, which provides, in pertinent part, that "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States."

President Clinton is certainly ineligible to be elected to another presidential term, based on the 22nd Amendment. Some might infer from the 12th Amendment that he is therefore also ineligible to be elected to a vice-presidential term."

INFER?? Are they Demented? It EXPLICITLY says if you can't be elected president, you can't be elected VP! That's the point of the 12th Amendment!

Hello Left! Youse is Stoopid!


53 posted on 06/04/2004 1:34:36 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson