[rwfromkansas]

This is a piece of crap.

I understand the need for anonymous sources in journalism. Sometimes that is the only way you can get somebody to say something really important.

But, there is not a SINGLE named source in this article. You at least quote somebody, even if you have to use somebody anonymously elsewhere.

A story with zero quoted people does not have much credibility.

[Howlin]

You know about Doug Thompson; I just saw your name on that thread where he was exposed.

[pawdoggie]

This is naught but a naked attempt to morph George Bush with Richard Milhous Nixon. Would that some of this were true: I'd like to hear the President publicly denounce Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, George Soros and Kerry for aiding and abetting our enemies. I'd like to hear the President using the bully pulpit to take to task (by name) the Left wing jurists who are, without a single vote of the People, trying to impose homosexual marriage, anti-religious and anti-Christian rules and regulations and frivolous laws and litigation on all of us. But that just aint the Bush style.

Now, having said that do I believe that the President sometimes uses "salty language" to describe those he calls his political opponents? Yes, I do. Do I believe that GWB has a temper? yes I do. Do I believe that he keeps a Nixonian or Clintonian enemies list? No! Do I believe that he (unlike his opponents) regards any potentially effective method of political attack as fair game? No! Am I convinced that he even has a FDR style fire in the belly and political blood lust (of the kind he may well need by the time this campaign is over)? No!