Is it your assertion that "could be" means "claim"?
No. It is my "assertion" that due to the possibility of redundancy that the statement "So here we have proof that huge chunks of DNA are completely unnecessary." is false.
97 posted on 06/04/2004 9:15:40 PM PDT by AndrewC
(I am a Bertrand Russell agnostic, even an atheist.</sarcasm>)