To: AndrewC
There is no explanation for this under RMNS. Do you have one?Not having an explanation is a rather common phenomenon in science. It is only a problem if you assume everything can be deduced from first principles. Otherwise it is merely a new challenge.
28 posted on
06/04/2004 9:13:55 AM PDT by
js1138
(In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
To: js1138
Not having an explanation is a rather common phenomenon in scienceYes, it is a death knell for a theory with the inability to do the explaining.
29 posted on
06/04/2004 9:18:53 AM PDT by
AndrewC
(I am a Bertrand Russell agnostic, even an atheist.</sarcasm>)
To: js1138
It is only a problem if you assume everything can be deduced from first principles. No, it is a problem when it is not consistent with first principles.
31 posted on
06/04/2004 9:26:24 AM PDT by
AndrewC
(I am a Bertrand Russell agnostic, even an atheist.</sarcasm>)
To: js1138
Give it up! In "Stump the Dummies," the first time you don't know the answer, you lose.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson