[Just another Joe]

cin, go read your post #160 and tell me what you think it implies.
I'm really not trying to flame you. In your first post concerning the hit-and-run you do state "possible suspect" but that is your interpretation of the statement in the article.

We're basically on the same side on this one.
The female in the original article should have gone along her way when told to by a LEO.

[cinFLA]

cin, go read your post #160 and tell me what you think it implies.

I think you are referring to 137 which your 160 was a reply to. Basically, if you look at the post, you will not miss the sarcasm, especially the last line referring to calling Jesse Jackson. I was responding to the jack-booted thugs and presenting the other side.

If we are on the 'same side' why did you pick out my 'possible suspect' to critique when the jack-booted thuggers are trying to hang the cop?

[cinFLA]

but that is your interpretation of the statement in the article.

And I believe that an accurate interpretation of the statement is that he is possibly a suspect. After all, the cops went to find him as the owner of a car involved in a hit-and-run accident and they exchanged words and got into a scuffle. If he were the victim of the accident, I find it very unlikely that that would have happened.