Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Charles Martel
If so, the words of Judge Alex Kozinski would have told the stark truth of the matter.

Kozinski did great in his dissent on US v. Emerson, but I like Kleinfeld's dissent even better.

It is, IMHO, the most articulate and exhaustive defense of the 2nd admendment that I've ever read:

http://keepandbeararms.com/silveira/enbanc.asp

95 posted on 06/02/2004 8:27:53 PM PDT by Mulder (Those who would give up liberty for temporary security, deserve neither -- Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Mulder
Yes, his dissent was excellent.

"The sheer ponderousness of the panel's opinion—the mountain of verbiage it must deploy to explain away these fourteen short words of constitutional text—refutes its thesis far more convincingly than anything I might say."

The same is true of the McCain-Feingold monstrosity and the simple words of the First Amendment.

97 posted on 06/02/2004 8:43:17 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Kozinski did great in his dissent on US v. Emerson, but I like Kleinfeld's dissent even better.

I thought US v. Emerson was in the 5th Circuit, in and around Texas, IIRC. Wasn't Emerson the doc with a restraining order against him for threatened domestic violence? Was he transferred?

101 posted on 06/02/2004 10:11:50 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson