Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
He cited the fact that Great Britain did it, as did all countries (that he knew of) for the benefit of their own manufacturers.

He also stated explicitly that this had nothing to do with the questions as to the meaning of the Commerce Clause, so why are you trying to drag it into the discussion?

475 posted on 06/11/2004 9:28:36 AM PDT by tacticalogic (I Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
"so why are you trying to drag it into the discussion?"

WHAT???

YOU brought it up. You cited his letter as a "clue" to the "correct reading" of the Commerce Clause in your post #466!

Now you're saying that "He also stated explicitly that this had nothing to do with the questions as to the meaning of the Commerce Clause"?

Is there something wrong with you?

476 posted on 06/11/2004 9:40:22 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson