Yes, that's true. But the law wasn't written under the second amendment, and does not rely on the second amendment for its constitutionality. It was written under the commerce clause, and I thought you knew that. If you didn't know that then I apologize for berating you.
For anyone to say that a law outlawing bayonet lugs was written "despite the second amendment" would be disingenuous.
385 posted on 06/08/2004 12:43:55 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
Oh, I forgot. tacticalogic says (in his Harpo-like post) that it violated the second amendment. Therefore, it does.