Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

No actually, it has to do with the Fifth Amendment. I'll be happy to withdraw the question if you can explain why Commerce Clause legislation must comply with the Fifth Amendment, but not the Second.


403 posted on 06/08/2004 1:46:51 PM PDT by tacticalogic (I Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
No, it has to comply with the second.

Key question: Who says it didn't? AFAIK, the 1994 federal AWB wasn't challenged on second amendment grounds.

405 posted on 06/08/2004 2:02:34 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson