Posted on 06/01/2004 1:52:16 PM PDT by RWR8189
|
RALPH NADER SPOKESMAN KEVIN ZEESE: "We met with [Sen. John Kerry] and his staff last week and noticed afterwards that his staff said that Iraq was not discussed, when of course it was ... What I make of that is that he is very insecure about the issue because he wants the peace vote and the war vote." (Donald Lambro, “Base Yet To Unify Behind Kerry,” The Washington Times, http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20040601-122123-6646r.htm, 6/1/04)
Could John F'n Kerry be LYING about what was discussed at the meeting?
Naaaawwww. Not Kerry!
g
They discussed it before they didn't discuss it.
So9
Of course Iraq wasn't discussed.
He doesn't know where it is.
I so love that Ralph Nader is in the race to stir the pot!
Nader promised not to be a "spoiler" in the election. So if Nader chooses the same electoral slate as Kerry, Nader votes will go on Kerry's side of the electoral college.
What ..?? There are no votes or electoral votes for Nader which will go to Kerry .. where did you get that idea ..??
See the following thread on the 2 for 1 (kerry nader)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1129808/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.