Skip to comments.
Ban on Partial Birth Abortion Overturned
Fox News Alert
Posted on 06/01/2004 10:34:28 AM PDT by RWR8189
Just permanently overturned by a federal court....
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: courts; federalcourts; feminism; feminists; hags; infanticide; murder; nags; naral; now; oligarchy; partialbirthabortion; pba; satan; slaughter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-400 next last
To: RWR8189
Hamilton, Phyllis J.
- Born 1952 in Jacksonville, IL
Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. District Court, Northern District of California
Nominated by William J. Clinton on February 9, 2000, to a new seat created by 104 Stat. 5089, 5105; Confirmed by the Senate on May 24, 2000, and received commission on May 25, 2000.
Education:
Stanford University, B.A., 1974
Santa Clara University School of Law, J.D., 1976
Professional Career:
Deputy public defender, Office of the Public Defender, CA, 1976-1980
Manager, EEO Programs, Farinon Electric Corporation, 1980
Administrative judge, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, San Francisco Regional Office, CA, 1980-1985
Court commissioner, Municipal Court, Oakland-Piedmont-Emeryville Judicial District, 1985-1991
U.S. Magistrate Judge, Northern District of California, 1991-2000
Race or Ethnicity: African American
Gender: Female
21
posted on
06/01/2004 10:39:28 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Sub-Driver
"The act poses an undue burden on the blood profits earned from a woman's right to choose to kill her baby," Hamilton wrote. There. Fixed it.
22
posted on
06/01/2004 10:39:30 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(And I never see the IDF 'til it's way too late! Now I'm dyin' in the Gaza Strip in the blazin' sun.)
To: RWR8189
Judge Blocks Partial-Birth Abortion Ban
SAN FRANCISCO A federal judge Tuesday permanently blocked the Bush administration from enforcing the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act (search) against Planned Parenthood Federation of America (search) clinics and their doctors, who perform roughly half the nation's abortions.
U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton, ruling in one of three lawsuits challenging the Congressional legislation President Bush signed last year, said the first substantial legislation limiting a woman's right to choose was an unconstitutional infringement of three decades of Supreme Court precedent.
"The act poses an undue burden on a woman's right to choose an abortion," Hamilton wrote in her 120-page opinion.
Hamilton was the first of three federal judges presiding over lawsuits challenging the regulation to issue a decision. Bush signed the bill in November, saying "a terrible form of violence has been directed against children who are inches from birth while the law looked the other way."
In the banned procedure, which the government said was never medically necessary, a doctor partially removes a living fetus from the womb before puncturing or crushing its skull. Justice Department attorneys argued that dismembering the fetus in the woman's womb, and removing it in parts, was more humane than having a living fetus partially delivered before killing it.
"There is a substantial state interest in protecting potential life," Scott Simpson, the government's attorney who defended the act, argued before Hamilton last month.
He argued that the banned procedure "blurs the line of abortion and infanticide." Abortion proponents, however, argued that a woman's health during an abortion is more important than how the fetus is terminated, and that the banned method is often a safer solution.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,121435,00.html
23
posted on
06/01/2004 10:39:32 AM PDT
by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: RWR8189
And the tyranny of the leftist judiciary continues...
24
posted on
06/01/2004 10:39:36 AM PDT
by
GiveEmDubya
(Common Liberal Whine: (fill in blank)-ism/phobia!)
To: RWR8189
(censored!!!!)
Man, am I tired of judicial activists. They make me want to drink like a fish!
Well, we can hope in a lifetime or so when RvW is overturned. argh!!!!!
25
posted on
06/01/2004 10:39:49 AM PDT
by
Maigrey
(bagel-snarfin' neocon supportin' pseudojournalist and d*** proud of it!)
To: RWR8189
Just permanently overturned by a federal court.... That's a district court interpretation, and I would expect no other from a California courtroom.
26
posted on
06/01/2004 10:40:43 AM PDT
by
Charles Martel
("Who put the Tribbles in the Quadrotriticale?")
To: RWR8189
NO!!!!! This is horrible news. Simply disgustingly horrible.
27
posted on
06/01/2004 10:40:48 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: xrp
Seem to be....I've been enjoying their stupidity for years.
28
posted on
06/01/2004 10:41:13 AM PDT
by
zarf
(..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
To: Sub-Driver
SAN FRANCISCO -- A federal judge Tuesday declared unconstitutional the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, saying the measure infringes on a woman's right to choose. NINTH CIRCUIT!!! Of course!
They're going to have a REAL tough time saying this a woman doing what she wants with her own body when THE BABY'S BODY HAS ALREADY BEEN BORN. Let them try to fight this one up the court system-- this could be the thing that sets the public actively against judicial legislation.
29
posted on
06/01/2004 10:41:20 AM PDT
by
atomicpossum
(I give up! Entropy, you win!)
To: Maigrey
Yeah, somebody has got to let me know how a single judge can overrule the 435 member United States House of Representatives, the 100 member U.S. Senate, and the President of the United States. I'm sorry, but the math doesn't work here.
30
posted on
06/01/2004 10:41:22 AM PDT
by
alancarp
(When does it cease to be Freedom of the Press, and become outright sedition???)
To: dead
No fn wonder! From the 9th district. Maybe someone higher up can bushslap some since into her.
31
posted on
06/01/2004 10:41:27 AM PDT
by
Maigrey
(bagel-snarfin' neocon supportin' pseudojournalist and d*** proud of it!)
To: Sub-Driver
AN FRANCISCO -- A federal judge Tuesday declared unconstitutional the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, saying the measure infringes on a woman's right to choose. And where is that one spelled out in the Constitution ?
32
posted on
06/01/2004 10:41:30 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
To: RWR8189
"The act poses an undue burden on a woman's right to choose an abortion," Hamilton wrote in her 120-page opinion. Someone PLEASE show me where that right is codified on the federal level by the Constitution.
33
posted on
06/01/2004 10:41:34 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(John Kerry - Hillary without the fat ankles and the FBI files...)
To: RWR8189
She's a Klintoon nominee. In Kookiefornia no less. In San Francisco no less.
What can you expect
34
posted on
06/01/2004 10:41:39 AM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: RWR8189
Just permanently overturned by a federal court....
I'm no lawyer but this is impossible unless the Supreme Court has had its say in the matter. A lower court (probably the 9th Circuit out in LA LA Land) can't permanently do anything with the Supreme Courts say so one way or another.
35
posted on
06/01/2004 10:41:58 AM PDT
by
Militiaman7
(Fear not tomorrow, God is already there.)
To: mewzilla
Oh, I wasn't busting on you. I was recalling a
great thread that started with good intentions but quickly devolved into a farce. My apologies.
36
posted on
06/01/2004 10:42:02 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(And I never see the IDF 'til it's way too late! Now I'm dyin' in the Gaza Strip in the blazin' sun.)
To: RWR8189
This is great news!
It will certainly be upheld on appeal to the 9th Circus, then once and for all the USSC will have to review the actual merits of the Roe V Wade abomination.
Even if it only puts a little dink in the armor of the pro abort courts it's a start.
37
posted on
06/01/2004 10:42:03 AM PDT
by
American_Centurion
(Daisy cutters trump wiretaps everytime!)
To: RWR8189
Okay,
A. No federal court save the US Supreme Court can 'permanently' overturn anything unless the Supreme agrees or at least refuses to hear the case [basically the same thing].
B. This was some activist hack court in San Francisco, Mexistania.
Relax already...let it run it's course.
38
posted on
06/01/2004 10:42:16 AM PDT
by
VaBthang4
("He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps")
To: Behind Liberal Lines
~~PBA?~~
Pro Bowler Association
39
posted on
06/01/2004 10:42:50 AM PDT
by
mlbford2
(Sorry for spelling errors, I'm a product of a state university)
To: RWR8189
"SAN FRANCISCO A federal judge Tuesday
permanently blocked the Bush administration"
It ain't permanent until SCOTUS says it's permanent. Any maybe not even then. Sheesh, the press...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-400 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson