Posted on 06/01/2004 6:31:44 AM PDT by tbird5
Bump.
It's the only way Kerry could appear faintly attractive to women.
The entire brain, and mindset, of this woman is displayed in this one phrase..
I didn't read the whole thing, but what she and her family went through is ridiculous.
Funny how Alex wrote her one-sided article and fled back to Africa. She's afraid to do a real interview and answer some real questions.
Turnabout's a bitch, ain't it, Alex? How's it feel to have the microphone shoved in your fat face?
What an embarrassingly self-serving article.
I wasnt named, but Kent explained everyone knew whom Drudge was talking about. I was stunned into silence.
Well, there was SOME reason "everyone knew" whom Drudge was talking about. Just how and why did they get THAT idea?
Why, if it is all untrue--and of course it may well be--did she not instantly deny it? If she didn't want to go public, why is she doing so now and resurrecting an issue everybody else had forgotten.
I can't wait to read the rest of this.
Actually it was quite an interesting article. Really shows the media for what they are.
From the preceding sentence to the above indignant comment, it sounds like her old boss and colleagues at the AP.
I haven't read the whole thing yet. This sounds promising. Lots of wide-eyed crap.
It's a classic attempt to try and get out ahead of the story, and shape it..the denial inf ront of the story..she goes into so much detail of her social and love life...attempting to prove it isn't true..it's what attorneys notice when peopel are lying on the witness stand, they add TOO MUCH details to their lies..that's what trips them up...I repeat my earlier statement...a person like Kerry who wasn't looking to hook-up with this chick, wouldn't allow himself to be seen int he same room talking to her alone, let alone at a bar....you avoid the appearance of impropriety...the timing of the article is signioficant..I look for the other show to drop soon....
And some of us were thrilled and relieved.
What a twit.
Exactly. Alex testified via her one-sided New York article and fled back to Africa to avoid cross examination. What is she afraid of?
She's not afraid...she probably could get a million for a book deal tomorrow, or at least an Enquirer article...or Playboy..but she's obviously a Kerry supporter, and she knows that if it comes up...well, that's it..
Another freeper directed me to Mickey Kaus on this:
http://slate.msn.com/id/2101504/
As he says, Polier raises as many questions as answers with this piece.
Ain't no doubt atall that Kerry is/was a player. Scent trails all over the place. Also, like his Kennedy models and mentors, members of his staff are/were trained to ferret out and cultivate "good leads." For example, Ted had people on his staff haunt upscale shopping centers to hit on women for him. If his staff started dating someone Ted found attractive, Ted would insist on a "share." arrangement! (Yeah, it's that sick in DC! Or haven't you ever heard of that congress critter from Sacramento?)
So to continue foreign correponding, the only real question is, "...has Momma Ketchup put the lid back on Kerry's bottle, or is it an "open" arrangement?" Ya gotta remember, before Teresa and the 57 Varieties came in the picture, Kerry was actually "homeless," mooching off a succession of rich pals.
Now about Alexandria. Columbia at least taught her about short, punchy paragraphs. But her style is like "Nancy Drew, Girl Reporter." The slant is obvious, as is the cover-up. "Nancy, you have told a falsehood."
I predict a bright future for her in Kenyan journalism.
Thanks for the link...good read..but those friggin' pop ups on that site...and I went to the TNR story it referenced...Kaus has it right..the whole thing doesn't pass the "whiff" test...but what's curious, if they thought they had killed/buried/discredited the story a few months ago, then why would they encourage her to resurrect it NOW..it makes peopel talk about it again..I'd wager a few bucks that Matt may have more info...
I'm not saying that the awkward way of handling the story is proof of its truth - it may just have been proof of how bad Kerry and Pollier are in understanding communication. I like the way she name drops to suggest sophistication (schools, intern assignments, international travel, etc.) - and yet she wants us to believe she was so naive as to not know that this needed a very quick response?
On the other hand - for you evil conspiracy theorists out there, if you assume the story is true (i.e., that Kerry did have an affair with her) and then you hypothesize what the campaign would have done in terms of damage control (Who is single male on the Kerry staff that travels with him a lot so we can float the story she was dating a staffer? Quick!) - you could come up with the same sequence of responses at the time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.