I don't care, just take away their right to be a free human being for life.
That's right.
Hangings cheaper.
More certain, too.
All we need is a mush-brained Governer down the line pardoning someone like that.
Fidel Castro seems to do that without an iota of criticism from the left and from democrats specifically.
The issue here is a mother with established maternal rights is objecting to the residential custody arrangment of her child based on the sexual acting up of the child in public. She has requested an investigation based on the current conduct of the child. She has requested a special atorney be apported solely for the interests of the child. (usually a pro-bono volunteer lawyer)
I consider this judge irresponsible to not at the very least order the investigation. I wonder if her refusal is a "payback is a female dog" situation where she is going to parrot whatever the removed judge was doing. Having seen enough of these child custody cases, they are all messy. However, there should be an automatic preference, and a rebuttable preference, for placing the child with the non-homosexual parents as a matter of public policy. In this case the mother. This would be no different than putting the child with the non-swinger parent, non-promiscous parent, non-beastiality parent, and non-crack addict parent.