Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kentucky

Pending Draft Legislation Targeted for Spring 2005
By Action Alert
May 27, 2004, 14:50



The Draft will Start in June 2005

There is pending legislation in the House and Senate (twin bills: S 89 and HR 163) which will time the program's initiation so the draft can begin at early as Spring 2005 -- just after the 2004 presidential election. The administration is quietly trying to get these bills passed now, while the public's attention is on the elections, so our action on this is needed immediately.

$28 million has been added to the 2004 Selective Service System (SSS) budget to prepare for a military draft that could start as early as June 15, 2005. Selective Service must report to Bush on March 31, 2005 that the system, which has lain dormant for decades, is ready for activation. Please see website: www.sss.gov/perfplan_fy2004.html to view the sss annual performance plan - fiscal year 2004.

The pentagon has quietly begun a public campaign to fill all 10,350 draft board positions and 11,070 appeals board slots nationwide.. Though this is an unpopular election year topic, military experts and influential members of congress are suggesting that if Rumsfeld's prediction of a "long, hard slog" in Iraq and Afghanistan [and a permanent state of war on "terrorism"] proves accurate, the U.S. may have no choice but to draft.

Congress brought twin bills, S. 89 and HR 163 forward this year, http://www.hslda.org/legislation/na...s89/default.asp entitled the Universal National Service Act of 2003, "to provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons [age 18--26] in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes." These active bills currently sit in the committee on armed services.

Dodging the draft will be more difficult than those from the Vietnam era. College and Canada will not be options. In December 2001, Canada and the U.S. signed a "smart border declaration," which could be used to keep would-be draft dodgers in. Signed by Canada's minister of foreign affairs, John Manley, and U.S. Homeland Security director, Tom Ridge, the declaration involves a 30-point plan which implements, among other things, a "pre-clearance agreement" of people entering and departing each country. Reforms aimed at making the draft more equitable along gender and class lines also eliminates higher education as a shelter. Underclassmen would only be able to postpone service until the end of their current semester. Seniors would have until the end of the academic year.

Even those voters who currently support US actions abroad may still object to this move, knowing their own children or grandchildren will not have a say about whether to fight. Not that it should make a difference, but this plan, among other things, eliminates higher education as a shelter and includes women in the draft.

The public has a right to air their opinions about such an important decision.

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=5834001&content_dir=ua_congressorg


13 posted on 05/31/2004 10:35:20 AM PDT by take
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: take
Horsefeathers. Dems trying to undermine the president politically float the idea of a draft deliberately to try to increase antagonism toward the war. The administration has no interest in a draft, neither does the military. Ordinary administrative stuff for the selective service system is being spun, along with those Dem lies, into something they are not. Meanwhile, the volunteer military continues to hit all of its manpower targets, because increased patriotism has helped recruitment, while "stop loss" orders and longer deployments have reduced retirements.
17 posted on 05/31/2004 10:42:14 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: take

This is the first I've heard of this bill. How frightening.


47 posted on 05/31/2004 11:45:10 AM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: take

HR163 is literally on the floor of the House. S89 wasn't even touched by the Senate. When the draft comes up at my high school...I have to show them the web site so they can cool their heels. The 3 Dems who are sponsoring this bill are trying to scare the young people.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:HR00163:


56 posted on 05/31/2004 12:30:48 PM PDT by Milligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson