[Americathy]

You are honing in on one paragraph and missing the point: "Pile on any other mistakes the President's team has made and, for argument's sake, I won t protest." (my italics) Farber's consistent point is that he couldn't care less about whether or not that other stuff is true, whether the Bush admin has made mistakes. Of course they have, they are human! His concern has been our lack of concern over the big picture, which he knows Bush understands. I'm with him.

[GailA]

This election boils down to two things, both very, very important to our lives. The War of Terror and how it is prosecuted, GW's style with kill them first, or hanoi john's style serve them with court papers, understand them style.

Then there is the 2-4 Supreme Court Justices which will impact our lives on a scale we have not known in our life time. If we think Roe v Wade was bad, you ain't seen nothing yet if hanoi john wins all his enviro whacko stuff, his homo sexual agenda and anti-2A, anti-death penalty stuff will go into effect via black robe tyrants.

[HankReardon]

I get his point completly, that one paragraph deserves to be focused upon, it is incorrect. I want to know what prompts these people to DESIRE to believe that there were no WMD's in Iraq that that never was an Iraq-Al Qaeda connection to such an extent as to state it so openly. It is so easily disproven.