A strong ecconomy will protect the environment far better than a poverty environment. Environwackos are only about figuring out how to get their mits on your property. After all envirowackos care more about society than anyone else and therefore they should have dictatorial control.
They tend to be self-annointed "activists" with mediocre minds and morality, backed by the enormous wealth of various "environmentalist charities". The effect is to arm the schoolyard bullies with enormous power.
Some of the meanest, cruelest, most sadistic, most disgusting people I have ever know were in the "environmentalist" movement.
I still recycle. My wife's still a vegetarian. But I have adopted this rule of thumb: If the "environmentalists" are for it, oppose it. If they are against it, support it.
Gee, I wonder what the heads of the big enviro groups drive?
Libs are perfectly content to burn down all our trees with assinine policies, but doing something intelligent to save them is evil capitalism.
Thanks for posting this. Great info for the work I do in the Real World.
Here's an environment question we never see in these polls:
Given a choice, would you drink a cup of water from an American river, or a river in another country?
They just don't get it.
When environmentalists publicly admit that trees are a crop instead of something sacred, I'll listen to them. Not before.
These 'enviromental groups' - PETA, Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, Earth First, etc - are not environmental groups. They are communist and they are hypocrites in their concrete jungles.
Whatever the heck "protecting" the environment means..............."the environment" probably needs more protection from the Third Way Sustainable Development New World Odor Elite..
You can grow pulp trees in three to five years....if the nation allowed commerical production of hemp we could really have some renewable pulp resources...
(((ping)))
I think the biggest Bush bashers are teachers! One said Bush is destroying our environment. I said "Really?" I thought the "Healthy Forest Act" was sensible. Get rid of dead and diease trees to avoid out of control wild fires. How much environmental damage did those Southern California wild fires cost? No vegetation to protect the top soil or water tables. He didn't have a good answer but to say Califorians can pay for the damages. He thinks Republican's are not good stewardship of the forest. He also blames Bush for underfunding "No Child Left Behind Act" which was passed in the Senate like 85 to 10...but that's another story.
A)They grow back. and
B)How does the big evil capitalist timber industry expect to stay in business after cutting down all of their product?
The dirty little commie just backed off my porch in a hushed stupor.