Skip to comments.
'SHREK 2' PASSES 'DAY AFTER TOMORROW' IN BOXOFFICE UPSET... [Drudge followup]
Box Office Mojo via Drudge ^
| 5/30/04
Posted on 05/30/2004 6:30:25 PM PDT by Cicero
FR rules won't let me post more than a sentence. Click the link to see it.
(Excerpt) Read more at boxofficemojo.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boxoffice; globalwarming; shrek2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Day After Tomorrow must be getting rotten word of mouth. It had a huge start but it's already dropping like a rock, only three days out.
Good news for conservatives.
1
posted on
05/30/2004 6:30:27 PM PDT
by
Cicero
To: Cicero
When it rains it pours go shreck
2
posted on
05/30/2004 6:34:57 PM PDT
by
al baby
(Hope I don't get into trouble for this)
To: al baby
3
posted on
05/30/2004 6:35:32 PM PDT
by
al baby
(Hope I don't get into trouble for this)
To: Cicero
I am som glad to hear this. I hope The Day After Tomorrow doesn't even make back what it cost to produce.
4
posted on
05/30/2004 6:38:49 PM PDT
by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: Cicero
5
posted on
05/30/2004 6:38:52 PM PDT
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: Cicero

Very suspicious.
To: JennysCool
The face of a great weaver of tales!
7
posted on
05/30/2004 6:42:35 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: CzarNicky
I hope The Day After Tomorrow doesn't even make back what it cost to produce. 1st day estimate, if even just somewhat accurate, makes it fairly likely it will make back cost of production.
8
posted on
05/30/2004 6:46:41 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/ ||| sionnsar: the part of the bagpipe where the melody comes out)
To: Cicero
'The Passion of the Christ 2' will smash them all!
To: bvw
Agreed! I hope Art made a good killing on this!
To: Cicero
Good news? It made $70 million in three days and $82 million more overseas in that time. Tomorrow is a holiday, so it'll still pull in more than $10 million. So that's probably $165 million in just four days worldwide. It's total cost to make and market is about $175 million. So with the studio's roughly 55% cut of box office, it's breakeven point in box office will be around $318 million. Even with huge drops, it's going to make some money (real money that would make Mr. Moore green with commie envy). So the producer gets to be a big Hollywood hero.
It's only in second place because another film is setting new records, not because it bombed.
11
posted on
05/30/2004 6:57:16 PM PDT
by
LenS
To: All
I did actually go see the movie. Basically plays like a souped up TV movie. The special effects are pretty cool, but not better than in other movies of the past. What I think is very interesting about the political angle is that Quaid's character talks of the Kyoto accords as an answer to global warming, but states the events that would eventually unfold in the movie had not happened in 10,000 years. Thus, the far-fetched events of the movie had happened some 10,000 years prior, without the assistance of evil internal combustion engines, emissions from vile industries of various types, etc. Yet the premise of the movie is that the cataclysm is some how man-made. I guess this means those woolly mammoths, saber toothed tigers, and various other now extinct animals got just what they deserved, being the chief polluters of their day.
To: Cicero
Shrek stars that ditz Cameron Diaz. Neither movie is worth my spending the gas, time and money to see.
13
posted on
05/30/2004 7:09:01 PM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: bvw; JennysCool; Art Bell
14
posted on
05/30/2004 7:10:33 PM PDT
by
lonevoice
(Some things have to be believed to be seen)
To: Cicero
Not really. It is pretty constant.
It is targeted at an older audience, so Friday would be big.
When I saw Friday's numbers I expected Shrek to win the weekend because it will draw kids in Friday-Monday.
15
posted on
05/30/2004 7:24:45 PM PDT
by
sharktrager
(Insanity: To continue repeating the same act, each time expecting a different result.)
To: sharktrager
I saw the movie, and it wasn'too bad. The special effects are worth it. The plot and dialog were average. (I thought Van Helsing was worse) Of course the science behind it was total bunk. Even the global warming scientist dissed pretty good. Only a couple of time did I get a "barf moment". Could have been pretty good. Again, should see it for the special effects.
16
posted on
05/30/2004 7:48:27 PM PDT
by
gswilder
To: Cicero
Today, outside the mall theater where Day After Tomorrow was playing (on two screens?!), a table manned by two eager Democrats was nearby. The table was covered with Kerry bumper stickers and buttons, as if people were going to rush out of the theater, champing at the bit to heal the earth by voting for JFnK. Let's hope they don't - and don't get the same urge after watching Moore's cinematic garbage.
17
posted on
05/30/2004 7:52:57 PM PDT
by
Moonmad27
(Imagine our country under the "leadership" of a President Kerry. Scary, isn't it?! Vote W in 04!)
To: lilylangtree
Saw Shrek 2 today. It was cute, and an absolute technical marvel. Go see it, even if you think Cameron Diaz is a ditch - it's easy to ignore her since she's just a voice, not seen on the screen. Antonio Banderas as Puss in Boots was hilarious.
18
posted on
05/30/2004 7:55:03 PM PDT
by
Moonmad27
(Imagine our country under the "leadership" of a President Kerry. Scary, isn't it?! Vote W in 04!)
To: gswilder
I saw the movie, and it wasn'too bad. The special effects are worth it. The plot and dialog were average. (I thought Van Helsing was worse) I also saw both. Day wasn't bad entertainment. Check your brain at the door. But I loved Van Helsing. It was a comic book with the writing to match.
19
posted on
05/30/2004 8:17:48 PM PDT
by
buccaneer81
(Rick Nash will score 40 goals this season...)
To: Cicero
How is that an 'upset'?
A good movie beats out a total dud.
Who'd a thunk.
20
posted on
05/30/2004 8:40:51 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(Peace through Victory! Iraq victory, W victory, American victory!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson