Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Remember_Salamis
Corporatism has most decidedly NOT replaced Capitalism. It is one form of capitalism, just as are Mercantilism, Communism and Fascism and other forms of socialism and like those forms, Corporatism is modification and stifling of the free market. Capitalism is the use of a portion of the earnings of production to increase production or commence new production. That is Capital and its uses. Socialists simply believe that government is the proper custodian and dispenser of capital. In Mercantilism government does not own capital but government determines who has access to capital.

Socialism has never opposed capitalism but opposes, rather, the free market. K. Marx's book Capital is about the "proper" uses of capital and it's formation and control, not about whether it should exist or not. Free Capitalism might be a better term for the economic system that built America.

5 posted on 05/30/2004 3:48:47 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: arthurus
Free Capitalism might be a better term for the economic system that built America.

Not true. America was built on a moral and religious foundation. The original small-government society was possible, because people were largely self-regulating.

Free Capitalism naturally thrived in this environment, but it must be acknowledged that the early industrial tycoons were not particularly well-behaved. It's fine to blame "progressives" for the rise of big government, but it's necessary also to acknowledge that they were responding to the excesses and real wrong-doings of a "Free Capitalism."

47 posted on 06/02/2004 8:20:32 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson