Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beavus
Yes. But the lack of development of a private space travel industry since 1969 is a testament to the difficulty of making a profitable enterprise with existing technology.

This is largely because only recently has rocket technology gotten cheap enough for private investors to afford. After all, at the beginning of my career computers were so expensive that only a few banks and universities could afford one. Add to that foot-dragging by governments who are reluctant to allow private parties to take physical risks.

136 posted on 05/30/2004 2:17:50 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: BlazingArizona

I don't disagree with that, but the real bottom line is that it takes a huge amount of energy per kilogram per second escape the earth's atmosphere. That translates into huge $$$/kg/s. Cheaper forms of energy will have to be found, or we will have to wait until people become affluent enough to cover such costs. Technological innovation pushes the former, and capitalism (freedom) the latter.


169 posted on 05/31/2004 5:51:27 AM PDT by beavus (KILL TERRORISTS KILL TERRORISTS KILL TERRORISTS KILL TERRORISTS KILL TERRORISTS KILL TERRORISTS, etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson