Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/28/2004 5:24:16 PM PDT by Cracker72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cracker72

This is too dumb to even bring up.


2 posted on 05/28/2004 5:28:33 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

Wait a tic...he says he's a man and a woman, yet he still is a he? Well, if he's both, couldn't he marry himself?


3 posted on 05/28/2004 5:29:03 PM PDT by zahal724
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

This is BS, even an XXY or XXXY has is dominate to one or the other. Additionally, at birth they are listed as M or F. this is just an attack by homosexuals who are exposing their next line of attack upon passage of the Marriage Amendments.


4 posted on 05/28/2004 5:29:40 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

Intersex? You would think these people could at least come up with a better name for this crap. Like maybe multi-sex. I'm sure the liberals will fix that later.


10 posted on 05/28/2004 5:49:56 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72
Alexander MacFarlane has both male and female physiology

Well then, old Alexander/Alexandra should just go #^ck himself/herself. Hermaphrodites, arise.

11 posted on 05/28/2004 5:50:20 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

So it's a man with boobs. BFD. If that's what makes you intersex, then Ted Kennedy would surely qualify.


19 posted on 05/28/2004 6:20:01 PM PDT by GulliverSwift (Leftists & Islamists, the coalition of the evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72
Just thought of this: In the current day and age, with current practice only allowing marriage between a man and a woman, would a person born without necessary organs (I don't know why they would be) be allowed to marry a gender of their choosing? And what if, as was the case with the man recently in the news (don't know the name), there was an error in circumcison and the genital areas were damaged, leading doctors to attempt to rebuild the man as a woman, who would they be allowed to marry?

Essentially, the question is this: what if the genetics of an individual say one thing, and through some twist of fate, the body says another thing.

(I don't know why this popped into my head, but I think it deserves some discussion, because I really am at a loss for what to say)
21 posted on 05/28/2004 6:41:27 PM PDT by Gid_29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson