Gore mentally unstable/Joseph Farah strongly urges sedating 'psycho' ex-VP, medical help

What are you talking about?

I am one of the biggest supporters of President Bush on this forum. My comment had absolutely nothing to do with the President.

It didn't have anything to do with Gore, Kerry, Dean, Emeril, Kennedy, Castro, Khrushchev, or Hilter.

My remark had to do with the writer of this article.

I don't like his style of writing one bit. He tends to use an emotional style of writing that I don't PERSONALLY care for. My opinion is based on reading many other articles by this guy as well as this one.

I really don't appreciate your references to Rosie as a play on my screen name or any drug references or anything else.

Your comments were totally out of line and disrepectful.

Do not manipulate my screen name. Do not address me with this sort of trash again.

I can see where it might have seemed like that's what I meant.

Sorry about jumping to conclusions.

He tends to use lots of personal emotion in his articles, so every time I read one from him, I notice the emotional part.

He doesn't like President Bush, and he gets upset and emotional about him.

He even writes really defensive articles responding to reader's email.

It just strikes me sort of funny.

I think that it would be really great to get a compilation of wonderful photos like this, of Al, Ted, Nancy, Howard, Hitlery, all of 'em busting a gut with that very look on their faces: that look of evil. Very telling. A poster full of those with a caption along the lines of, "Are these the kind of people that you'd trust with a finger on The Button?" Regardless whatever else you may have thought of Slick Willie (personally, I try to think as little as possible), he would never have the lack of poise to make such a public spectacle of himself. He was that smart, at least.

Whoops! I'm sorry I read you wrong. In the reply that you wrote which said, "I agree with him, but he seems awfully dramatic," I thought the pronoun "him" referred to Al Gore. I thought you were in agreement with what Gore had to say about George Bush. I agree with JohnHuang2's post and also have been a long admirer of JohnHuang2's writings in the Free Republic. I don't think he is emotional like the left is emotional. I think JohnHuang2 writes about the facts with passion. What I wrote to you was with the sarcasm button turned on because I thought you were a Gore supporter. Since the state flower of Texas is the Bluebonnet and not the Yellow Rose, I should have called you Bluebonnet.

What I was writing about was that if Al Gore (and others) were to encourage John Kerry to go over the top like Al Gore has been doing, we would certainly have George Bush reelected.

Also, Adolf Hitler was not the charismatic speaker when he first got into politics. He was coached by a team of professionals selected by his party to help him polish his delivery. If Kerry were put through such a coaching process, with the influence of the radical left, that trademark "emotional style" that is characteristic of the left would emerge. If being called Rosie tweeked your feelings, the type of makeover that the left has in store for Kerry would set you and the American electorate into orbit. You and me and most of America would celebrate "W's" victory on November 2nd.

When the debates happen, Kerry will not only have to measure up to Bush's command of the facts, but Kerry also has a certain woody nature to his delivery that will fall flat next to Bush. There will be one outcome in the debates: Bush wins.

Now if we could get Kerry's handlers to teach him to bark like a dog, we could get a speech out of Kerry that will be such a spectacle in American politics that Howard Dean's yelp would be like puppy talk. However, to be a salty dog, one has to be a well seasoned sailer. That seasoning I don't think Kerry got in only four months of swift boating in Viet Nam. Your dog Salty has more salty dog on his paw than Kerry ever got. As far as if Kerry could reach the level of doggy methane, well, that's the level of "lovable dogginess" we would want. He would then be more suitable for city dog catcher than President.

Thank you for your post explaining what you meant.

I like JohnHuang2's articles also. What I was referring to is Joseph Farah, the author of this piece.

He tends to get very worked up about things in his writings. He doesn't like President Bush and his articles about him get emotional sometimes.

He also got really worked up when he thought the transfer of sovereignty meant we were leaving Iraq all together. I remember that article clearly because he was so intense, that I tried to send a rather lengthy email telling him to calm down, and my computer shut itself down just as I was about to hit send. That was frustrating to say the least.

So, when I read his articles, I tend to notice that kind of thing.

This article really is pretty mild as far as he is concerned, so that must be why I was misunderstood by you and one other poster.

I am certainly a long way from a Gore supporter. He creeps me out.

About the "Rosie" reference, I took it as some sort of comparison to the horrid Rosie O'Donnell.

The FR "Rosie" references are always (and rightly so) pretty nasty, so I thought that's what you meant.

You're right about the debates. GWB will calmly and competently rip Kerry to pieces.

(My ex-husband used to call me his Yellow Rose of Texas. I liked it when he called me that, but the bluebonnets were what I had in mind with my screen name.)

Thanks again for your post.

Tammy

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.