Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Gordon
If FatAss is not making his Berg interview public, it is most certainly because Nick Berg (jr) said positive things about Operation Iraqi Freedom and President Bush. Nick Berg (jr) was a known supporter Bush and his actions

If Moore thought Berg was a Bush supporter before the interview, he would not have bothered to interview Berg.

If Berg talked like a Bush supporter, Moore would not have bothered continuing the interview, and there would not be 20 minutes of footage.

Moore went to the trouble of interviewing Berg, and accumulated 20 minutes of footage. Therefore there is somethingg more here than meets the eye

913 posted on 05/28/2004 3:22:19 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (That which does not kill me had better be able to run away damn fast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: SauronOfMordor
But the whole conspiracy relies on Berg maintaining a pro-war ideology. It would have been foolish for Nick to blow his cover like that.

The only way I can fit it into the conspiracy is if Iwo is right that maybe Moore was planning a before/after thing, where he looks like a pro-war guy til he has spent some time there, then has a change of position.... and the "after" interview got blown by Nick's capture.

Problem with that is that Nick would have a lot of FBI agents suspicious about him when they saw the "after" interview. Knowing all the things we know about him, his "conversion" story would be suspect.
918 posted on 05/28/2004 3:30:35 PM PDT by Trinity_Tx (Most of our so-called reasoning consists in finding arguments for going on believin as we already do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 913 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson