Perhaps. But if so, I *do* hope he goes back to the "justifying the war" question and does a *detailed* justification of the Iraq war:
Lay out the saddam/al Qaueda connections we *now* know;
point out the WMD evidence we now have;
point out the other threats;
point out how Iraqi liberation changes the war-on-terror situation;
points out success at rooting out oil-for-food corruption, etc.
He needs to consider the political angle of making the American electorate comfortable with the justification, purpose and progress towards victory of the effort in Iraq.
Well that would be looking backwards instead of focusing on how we will move forward. Yes he needs to lay out all of what you laid out but not in this series. If the plan he has in place fails, he could show pictures with Saddam and Osamma in bed together and it wouldn't change anything. He has bet the entire farm on success of post war Iraq, not what led us to war in the first place.