Posted on 05/27/2004 6:36:54 PM PDT by tuckrdout
With their recent successes they have become emboldened.
LOL! Isn't that true?! Democrats can have political fundraisers at any church that will have them, and there are no repercussions. In fact St. Pauls Methodist church in Helena held a MHR task force--(one of the very groups who filed this "complaint")--- event a few months ago!
I agree with that!
If the Montana libs are successful with their suit I will be tempted to organize a group to sue every black church that hosts a guest sermon by a Dem politician.
Because, ultimately, the decision will be before the Montana Supreme Court, and not the Massachusetts SJC. Which one do you think is likely to sustain the church's free speech activities?
This is clearly an attempt to silence free speech.
No one has the right not to get sued. If we are to have freedom, then freedom must always be defended.
There's an old maxim about picking your battles. Gay rights groups used to follow it quite well, only trying to challenge the laws in places where they were likely to get a judiciary more in sympathy with their views. Overreaching and trying to get judicial victories out in flyover country is likely to backfire on them. By the time the SCOTUS takes up the issue of gay marriage, and gay hate speech, there is likely to be an entire body of law in many jurisdictions that do not favor the gay rights side.
It's not absolutely determinative of what the SCOTUS will do, but it will be a factor influencing their decisions. By the time that the SCOTUS struck down bans on interracial marriage, only a relative few states had laws against it, and only Virginia was still actively enforcing it. If the SCOTUS visited the issue right after California's Supreme Court struck down CA's interracial marriage ban in 1948, there might have been a precident set that would not have fallen so easily in 1967. The same thing is possible here.
| What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda |
|
|
| Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
|
|
| Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues" |
Gotcha...
" As a man danced, so the drums were beaten for him" Achebe,
I wonder what THE REVEREND Jesse Jackson's thoughts on this are? Or maybe THE REVEREND Al Sharpton could answer it instead.
I am very offended by this demeaning choice of words. Olson is insulting, ignorant and obviously a bigot!
Actually this article is the definition of bigotry.
Notice the media and the ACLU never complained about the "Separation of Church & State" when Al Sharpton ran for President.
Agreed. It's outrageous!
Nor when Al Gore made campaign speeches in Black Churches.
bttt
Meanwhile, if you are a Black Preacher in a Black Baptist Church, you can drag John F'n Kerry up to the pulpit, scream "Praise the Lord and Vote for this man" and pass the plate for his campaign, and NOTHING will ever happen to you.
separation of church and state?
has no one but conservatives ever actually READ the US Constitution???
Way to go, Montana!
And thus it starts . . . . .
Someone please tell me what the F**K a Commissioner of Political Practices is! Is this BS for real? Have we become the former Soviet Union? Have they mangaged to really defeat us from within as promised by using the educational systme (NEA)?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.