Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: take
""Even though this bill is sponsored by Gordon Smith and Orrin Hatch -- both Republicans -- it's really the old Kennedy hate crimes bill that's been resurrected."

And my friends and wife wonder why I am not a Republican any longer.

My father said to me 35 years ago, "there isn't a nickels worth of difference between a Democrat and Republican."

For all of you "conservatives," (which implies conserving something, such as the Bill of Rights) contact your U.S. Senator and read the 1st Amendment to him/her:

"Congress shall make no law...of religion...prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,"

Ask you Senator, "what part of NO do you not understand?"

If you live in Missouri, remind Senators Bond and Talent that in addition to the federal constitution protecting freedom of speech, the Missouri Constitution is just as unambiguous in protecting speech:

"Section 8. That no law shall be passed impairing the freedom of speech, no matter by what means communicated: that every person shall be free to say, write or publish, or otherwise communicate whatever he will on any subject,"

10 posted on 05/27/2004 6:49:31 PM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tahiti
For all of you "conservatives," (which implies conserving something, such as the Bill of Rights) contact your U.S. Senator and read the 1st Amendment to him/her:

Conservatism means today conserving jobs for Republicans.

14 posted on 05/27/2004 7:19:19 PM PDT by A. Pole ("Stating the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men." George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: tahiti

Most states have a similar law, but next they will be challenging state law ...IF they can get a federal law passed.


32 posted on 05/27/2004 8:01:30 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: tahiti

GOP revolution on its last legs

May 27, 2004

BY ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST





Dr. Tom Coburn, the plainspoken obstetrician from Muskogee, Okla., was back in Washington briefly last week. Republican senators greeted him with mixed emotions. He is their best hope for keeping an Oklahoma seat Republican in the closely divided Senate. The bad news is, he would be as prickly as he was during his six years in the House (1995-2000).



Coburn's problem is that he takes seriously the professed Republican agenda: limited government, entitlement reform and anti-abortion advocacy. He was a rare sincere GOP supporter of term limits, leaving the House after three terms as he promised to do. The result is scant support for Coburn from the Republican establishment.

That situation suggests the current realignment cycle in American politics is nearing an end after 36 years, with the Republican Party displaying symptoms of a nervous breakdown. The party's leadership, from President Bush on down, went out of its way to push the undependable Republican Sen. Arlen Specter to victory against a staunch conservative in the Pennsylvania primary because he was considered a stronger general election candidate. In contrast, dependably conservative Coburn gets no establishment support in the contested Oklahoma primary, though he is the best bet in November.

The Oklahoma Senate seat was safely Republican until Sen. Don Nickles surprised everybody by not seeking re-election. Nickles, Sen. James Inhofe and the state party apparatus got behind former Oklahoma City Mayor Kirk Humphreys. Conservative Republican Rep. Ernest Istook wanted to run but was squeezed out. The only problem was that Humphreys looked like a loser against Rep. Brad Carson, a clever Democrat who votes with the liberals two-thirds of the time but sounds like a moderate in Oklahoma.

With a Democratic victory in sight, Coburn on March 1 ended his retirement from politics. Without financing or endorsements, he had a 12-point lead over Humphreys and was running even with Carson, according to the Tulsa World's poll (taken March 26-April 5). Instead of generating support, those numbers intensified the establishment's determination to keep Coburn in Muskogee. Instead of raising money for him, the Republican lobbyist community whispered that Coburn was not solidly for Bush.

All this dates back a decade when Coburn came to Washington as a foot soldier in the Gingrich Revolution. By July 1997, Coburn had concluded that Speaker Newt Gingrich was no revolutionary. He was a leader in the unsuccessful coup attempt to replace Gingrich with then-Rep. Bill Paxon, now the only big-time Washington lobbyist who supports Coburn.

Coburn in the Senate can be expected to act much as he did in the House, when he constantly harassed the appropriators for spending the budget surplus. He would not follow the accepted freshman senator's model of spending his first two years listening and waiting. From day one, he would join John McCain in upbraiding colleagues over their insatiable appetite for pork. He would push immediately for Social Security and Medicare reform. He would make clear his unhappiness over the way the Department of Health and Human Services has been run under Republican management led by Secretary Tommy Thompson.

Coburn was so uncongenial to the go-along, get-along mood that characterized the Republican majority in the House that a conflict-of-interest complaint was filed against him because he went back to Muskogee every week to deliver babies. If he had to choose, he declared, he would give up Congress -- and the complaint was dropped. In his current campaign, Coburn spends two days a week practicing medicine.

In announcing his candidacy, Coburn took dead aim at professional politicians: ''I believe we have a deficit of moral courage in the United States Congress. We have many learned individuals who know what is right but have not the courage to stand against the moral corruption that is now attempting to undermine our republic.'' Tom Coburn is not running to be the most popular senator.




55 posted on 05/27/2004 9:09:01 PM PDT by take
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: tahiti

bump


94 posted on 05/29/2004 1:44:40 PM PDT by take
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson