Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black children might have been better off without Brown vs. Board
Stanford Report ^ | April 21, 2004 | Lisa Trei

Posted on 05/27/2004 4:32:53 PM PDT by ancientart

While honoring the efforts and sacrifices of the people whose struggles culminated in Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court case that ended school segregation in this country, New York University Professor Derrick Bell provocatively suggested last week that generations of black children might have been better off if the case had failed.

(Excerpt) Read more at news-service.stanford.edu ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bell; brownvboardofed; brownvsboard; education; separatebutequal

1 posted on 05/27/2004 4:32:55 PM PDT by ancientart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ancientart

This on top of the comments from Bill Cosby at the NAACP the other day point to the same things. Of course racial inequalities were wrong and had to be addressed. The problem was how to address them. It was implemented badly and sustained to the detriment of all the children. Bussing caused major upheavals for black and white children. Many black children suffered serious emotional upheavals by being thrown into the middle of and expected to take on the trappings of a different culture than their own. Today's society is still divided racially, only this time by the blacks themselves. "Gangstas" is the name and booty and denigrating white culture is the game. Most affirmative action programs have failed miserably (with the exception of a few individuals who had the internal ambition to have made it anyway). The general state of education in the country is abominable and a state college degree of 2004 is probably not even on a par with the requirements for high school graduation in 1955.


2 posted on 05/27/2004 4:44:05 PM PDT by harrym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancientart
The article states,

"While they remained poor and disempowered, their status was no longer a result of denied equality. Rather, Bell said, it marked a personal failure to take advantage of one's defined equal status."

"court orders to ensure that black youngsters received the education they needed to progress would have achieved much more."

I have to disagree with this professor. Basically, he is against Brown v. Board because now black people have no excuse when they fail to achieve.

3 posted on 05/27/2004 5:25:38 PM PDT by DameAutour (It's not Bush, it's the Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancientart
A century before Brown, in some places, teaching a black to read would have been a major crime. Today, fifty years after Brown, teaching a black to read still seems to be a major crime, for the same reason.
4 posted on 05/27/2004 11:06:33 PM PDT by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson