Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philosofy123

If he wanted to admire a Civil War general, he should have used Lee, but unfortunately that wouldn't be PC for those masses who don't really know anything about Lee except that he was from the South. For example, Lee was publicly against slavery and didn't own slaves, as opposed to Grant and his wife, and started freeing the slaves of a whole plantation as soon as he inherited it. And as far as I know all of his armed conflicts were carried through with honor.


41 posted on 05/27/2004 1:04:24 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
Lee was not fighting to defend slavery, true enough.

Thomas J. Jackson even taught slaves to read -- which was illegal throughout much of the South (though I admit I don't know if it was in Virginia).

The Civil War was full of oddities like that. I guess that's why so many of us like to argue about it.

43 posted on 05/27/2004 1:08:02 PM PDT by Tallguy (Surviving in PA....thats the "other PA"...Pennsylvania.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson