Posted on 05/27/2004 5:38:42 AM PDT by mft112345
One undeniable fact is that if the terrorists win, history will not describe what they did as evil, it will in fact be described as brave and revolutionary. This is why the West must win this one, why we say it is a war over our very civilization.
However, if one subscribes to the theory of ethics that holds that there are some behaviors that we all agree are evil, then the killing of innocents must be among that list. In this respect they are true evil and it cannot be argued that they are not. Only if you first posit that some evil is OK is a theory that the ends justify the means going to be accepted.
I love this argument. My brother says the same thing.
Assuming, for the sake of argument, this true please explain the following:
Radical Isalm killing Eastern Orthodox Christians in Russia.
Radical Isalm killing Hindus in India.
Radical Isalm killing Sino-Bhuddists in Indonesia.
Radical Isalm killing Christians in the Phillipines
Radical Isalm killing Western Orthodox Christians in Africa.
Yea a father willing to P**S on his son's memory for his own political gain, what a guy.. Mr. Berg belongs to A.N.S.W.E.R., need I say more, his son was a Bush supporter.
We have just his father's "word" on that.
Well, let's take this idiot on his own words. He's sawing off the very branch he's sitting on. We should oblige him, and in so doing save a few trees.
Well said and I agree, tho I'm not sure what you mean about the need to justify evil. I know that to remove a life-threatening cancer, some of the good flesh must be removed in the process. That is not evil nor is it justifying evil. It's a necessity. If the disease does not self-remit it will be time for the surgeons. I believe there is a Biblical metaphor concerning offending body parts. In this case, parts of the body of mankind.
And why the evil do this is also insructive.....to avoid pain themselves!
It's basic, craven fear with its comcomitant selfishness on display.
For those with "eyes to see", that is.
I am not trying to justify evil, only to point out that those for whom the "ends justify the means" are the ones who are talking about justification of this type of evil. In my recollection, the group for whom "the ends justify the means" are the communists and socialists. One more note, reading "The Haj" and learning about the duplicity in the arab world and how this makes it easy for them to justify anything they do.
Yes. Thanks for the clarification. That definitely is part of the pathology, if not the very root.
"And why the evil do this is also insructive.....to avoid pain themselves!
It's basic, craven fear with its comcomitant selfishness on display.
For those with "eyes to see", that is."
Read recently about one of the benefits of accepting Islam. You get a clean slate regardless of what you were guilty of doing and are regarded with equal stature without the need to repent as though you didn't do anything wrong in the first place.
I can see why that would appeal to those in denial of the guilt hidden even in the deepest recesses of their hearts and refusing to come under conviction. With such a perspective, their 'sins' were self-justified and they continue to be practiced, condoned and accepted and believe they have no need of remission.
Self-deception -- the source of all sin. Abandoning their spiritual nature for the fruit of license.
I suppose that is why they have even stocked their version of 'heaven' with all the pleasures of the flesh. There has to be a pay-off somewhere for their 'submission' in terms they can relate to and look forward to. It's all about sex. Heh. Regretable.
And yes, Texaspeptoman, salient points! Guilt that is un-remitted hides deeper and causes psychosis. I think you're right about transference and casting its pain onto others. Strange that it's referred to as the religion of peace when nothing can be further from the truth. But I suppose Pax Islama is better than no peace at all if you've not known true peace. The old debbil rings up another sale, trading another bowl of porridge for another soul who forgot that the restaurant belonged to him in the first place.
No absolutes in the universe, heh? Let him get thrown in a shredder and see if he shouts 'It's all relative!' on his way down the chute.
The only reason we need to know what the other side is thinking is to kill them more efficiently.
'Course, I'd like to see how long he'd last before ended up like Berg or Perl if he peddled this crap to the Islamofascists. They don't seem to "feel" any need to understand us...
very well said!
Thank you! BTTT!
I don't know about this, wiping the slate clean has internal benefits, but whether the slate is clean on the holy register is something all men should be concerned with. In reading the Haj, (Leon Uris) and his take is that muslims have different levels of deprication regarding to whom the sin is related to. If an infidel, the sin is not so great. So what, evil will be defined as it is in the western countries, (that is judaism and christianity) when we win. If we don't win, not much will matter.
True. And there is still time so long as the Spirit of Grace is present and the time alloted for it has not ended.
The life assurance premiums for all have been paid in full, though some have destroyed their policy thinking it has expired -- while others rejected the need for one altogether.
But the clock is still ticking . . . . . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.