MSNBC-TV reported on Wednesday that sources close to the case confirmed that the prosecution's own lab found scientific evidence that could prove the alleged victim lied to detectives about having sex with another man shortly after her encounter with Bryant.
Tests evidently showed that another man's sperm was found in her body, whereas it had previously been reported that the sperm was found only in her underwear.
Memory is vague but didn't she admit to having sex either the day before or same day as the alleged rape occurred? My question is whether science can prove the other sperm found came afterwards.