It is not "bias" to hold to the principle of the "mother-father family" that Nature herself invented. YOU who are rebellious against the norm are the ones who are biased. WE are just standing on the firm ground of reality and nature. Those who want to invent a twisted and broken definition of family to justify a desire for sodomy with members of the same sex are trying to change the entire foundation of the human race solely to justify the perversion of homosexual sex.
That is not a good reason to rebel against mother nature. Plus, it won't work. The more success you have, the more YOUR foundation is broken as well. Complete success would mean the destruction of human civilization, since the human society is built upon the natural family - Father, Mother, children, and extended relatives.
You destroy that - and you'll find yourself in a strange world that even you are afraid in.
But it won't happen - we won't let you destroy the world.
It is not "bias" to say we are on the side of nature and truth, and refuse to be moved off of that platform. Your comment is like saying that it is biased to say that it is light in the daytime and dark in the nighttime. It's just the truth. You don't like it? Your problem.
Well-said.
They can't fit themselves and their desires in with the norm, so they neurotically spend their lives trying to re-make the norm in their own image.
Without heterosexual activity, there would be no babies for homosexuals to adopt when they decide they want to play "family". It appears that homosexual activists want to stamp out the practice of heterosexuality.
Carrying it to the extreme, this would mean stopping new humans from being born. The human race, quite simply, would die off.
Obviously, no normal person wants that to happen.
So I ask again: Considering that the birth of new humans is a direct outcome of the practice of normal, heterosexual sex, and that this is a benefit to humanity, what comparable benefit to humanity does homosexuality confer?