Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdReform

Pehaps the remaining science based members of the APA should publish an annex/adendum manual to adress just the PC areas of disease. It need not be as extensive as the DSM but it just needs to include items like homosexuality and other politically removed diseases.

This annex/addendum would then become mandatory for all psychologists. Even an expert testifying in court would be obligated to respond to the contents. It would become a required ownership manual. Done right any shrink who does not possess it would be deemed as unprofessional as a shrink who is "unaware" of the DSM.

Given enough circulation, the DSM editorial staff would have to directly attack the addendum and give it more legitimacy by attacking it.


66 posted on 05/27/2004 2:39:15 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory
A very interesting (and excellent) proposal. But the homosexual activists in the APA's would most likely ignore it and get away with it since they've bought and paid for a good many activist judges in courts across the country.
72 posted on 05/27/2004 8:00:41 PM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: longtermmemmory; All
Pediatrics Group Endorses Homosexual Adoption... But New Policy Places Children at Risk

On February 3rd, The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued a policy statement endorsing adoption by same-sex couples, saying they can provide the same emotionally healthy family life as heterosexual parents. The academy is urging its 55,000 members to take an active role in supporting laws that allow gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals to adopt the children of the individuals with whom they cohabit.

But this new policy is based on politics, not science. Sadly, although AAP policy carries significant weight in our nation's courts, it is not in the best interests of children, whose interests the AAP claims to represent.

Studies demonstrate that there is, in fact, a difference between non-heterosexual and heterosexual parenting. Children raised by non-heterosexual parents are placed at risk. They are more apt to experience gender and sexual confusion; they are more apt to become promiscuous; they are at greater risk of losing a parent to AIDS, substance abuse or suicide. They suffer more depression and other emotional difficulties. They are also more likely to engage in same-sex behavior.

Furthermore, non-heterosexual couples are less stable than heterosexual couples in their relationships and they are more likely to separate. Research reveals that promiscuity is virtually the norm among male non-heterosexuals. Violence is substantially higher in non-heterosexual relationships. The list of risk factors continues.

Nature created male and female to be complementary to each other in myriad ways that enhance not only the couple's relationship, but the healthy and stable development of the children they produce. It is well known that fatherlessness is responsible for many of the ills of children in our society. There are few bodies of research where the evidence is so clear: children need both a mother and a father. Homes with a married mother and father are, all things considered, far better for raising emotionally stable children.

Perhaps the time has come for rational, reasonable people to insist that organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics either base their policies on science, or else label themselves as political organizations and relinquish their tax-exempt statuses.

And maybe it's also time that federal, state and local governments discontinue reliance on professional organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics when they need accurate, dispassionate, scientific information.

It's also time that the American people insist on truth, not politics, from all of our professional organizations.


Copyright © NARTH. All Rights Reserved.

Updated: 30 September 2002


77 posted on 06/01/2004 9:07:36 AM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson