Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: looneyliberal
"More non-answer follows"

Well, was there a question in there someplace? Hm?

Not in what you posted. Jerk.
9 posted on 05/26/2004 7:18:34 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (You're it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
Russert: But this is nation-building.

Well, was there a question in there someplace?

No. But it was a mistake for Bush to go along with the premise, i.e. to let Tim decide the answer. Note, Tim wouldn't pose it as, "What do you call 'nation building', Mr. President?" He simply assumes his own judgement.

Fact is, this is not "what's called 'nation building'". This is filling the vacuum after vanquishing a threat to national security. The proof is the turnover June 30, which will just burn the Looney Left like jock itch when it happens.

Just the same, Looney conveniently omits the rest of the response, so maybe Bush does address that. And I don't see how this response by Bush, even if he is admitting a position change, is Anything like Slick Willie's "is" gag. After all, "nation building is a very vague term - a lot more vague than "is" or "sex" - and Bush's earlier stated position poses it as such: "...what's called 'nation-building'."

Looney needs to engage brain before typing.

11 posted on 05/26/2004 10:31:23 PM PDT by Nevermore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson