Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tricky_k_1972
I'm thinking the best approach would be a double or triple-layer thing. After or during inflation, one might inject some sort of hardening foam, which would provide rigidity, insulation (a big consideration), and some degree of shielding.

Note, however, that you probably couldn't have any penetrations (i.e., sensors, wires, windows, antenna mounts) on these guys. Not necessarily a bad thing, but it makes them less flexible than traditional rigid bodies.

9 posted on 05/25/2004 1:03:00 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb

Thats a good point about not docking the soyuz on the structural axis. Another interesting question would be how to use inflatable modules on future moon missions. You could have an inflatable mission module or landing module, but you'd have to be careful with docking. Also, you could do a transhab style thing with a solid core and fix any problems with that.

I believe they did design a window into the transhab somehow, so I think its possible.

injectable foam is an interesting idea. I'm sure it would expand very differently in space though. Maybe I could submit that to NASA as a student experiment thing.

"less flexible than rigid bodies": no pun intended, I'm sure.


10 posted on 05/25/2004 2:22:22 PM PDT by unibrowshift9b20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson