Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster

I understand, but would they ban cellphones because of that?When they use the word trigger could something have gotten lost in translation? I guesss what I am saying is with an explosion of this magnitude how would they determine a cell phone was the trigger mechanism?


126 posted on 06/01/2004 7:58:15 PM PDT by eastforker (The color of justice is green,just ask Johny Cochran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: eastforker; Boot Hill
Re #126

I do not know how they came up with that conclusion. Some news accounts did say that there were two explosions, one preceding the other by a short time. It may be that the first one created fire which spread out and triggered the second catastrophic explosion by engulfing the secret military cargo escorted by Syrians. If the first one occurred some distance away from the second one, it may be possible that some potential evidences for the first explosion managed to survive.

Of course, I am assuming that cell phone story is not just a cover story.

128 posted on 06/01/2004 8:11:34 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: eastforker
TigerLikesRooster:   "N. Koreans believe that cell phone(s) is(are) used to trigger the explosion."

eastforker:   "I understand, but would they ban cellphones because of that?"

Because they don't want cell phones to be used anymore to trigger explosions. (I must not understand your question.)

--Boot Hill

129 posted on 06/01/2004 8:52:11 PM PDT by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson